EBU Single Rulebook Q&A 9 September 2016 2016_2899 FINREP Taxonomy 2.5 Templates 04.04/18.00.b Validations

In taxonomy 2.5, are validations v3049_m to v3076_m the correct way round? That is, should the “<=” sign be “>=”? Taxonomy 2.5 includes a number of reactivated validations. In particular, validations v3049_m to v3076_m require, for each counterparty, that the provisions on non-performing exposures (template 18.00.