Court of Justice 30 April 1980, 136/79 (National Panasonic (UK) Limited v Commission of the European Communities.)
Also known as
The opinion of Advocate General Warner addresses the challenge by National Panasonic (UK) Limited against the Commission's decision requiring it to submit to an investigation under Article 14(3) of Regulation No 17. The applicant contended that the Commission was obligated to follow a two-stage procedure before issuing a binding decision, but the Advocate General concluded that Article 14 does not impose such a requirement, allowing the Commission discretion in its investigative approach. Ultimately, the opinion supports the validity of the Commission's decision and recommends dismissal of the action with costs.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 5 · 30-04-1980
Opinion of Mr advocate general Warner delivered on 30 april 1980 My Lords, This action is brought under Article 173 of the EEC Treaty by an English company, National Panasonic (UK) Limited, to challenge a decision of the Commission dated 22 June 1979 requiring it to submit to an investigation pursuant to Article 14 (3) of Regulation No 17.
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (5 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit