Court of Justice 2 July 1987, 140/86 (Gisela Strack v Commission of the European Communities.)
Also known as
The opinion addresses the dispute regarding Mrs. Strack's request for access to her deceased husband's personal file during the procedure for recognizing an occupational disease, specifically focusing on the interpretation of Article 26 of the Staff Regulations and the confidentiality of medical information. It concludes that while the principle of a single personal file exists, medical documents may be treated separately for ethical reasons, and access to these documents must be mediated through a chosen doctor to maintain medical confidentiality. Ultimately, the Commission's refusal to grant direct access to the medical documents before the appointment of a doctor was deemed appropriate, and the application was dismissed, with the Commission ordered to bear the costs.AI
European Union · · · 02-07-1987
OPINION OF MR ADVOCATE GENERAL DARMON delivered on 2 July 1987 ( *1 ) Mr President, Members of the Court, I — Subject and delimitation of the dispute 1. These proceedings fall within the context of the procedure for recognition of an occupational disease as laid down in Article 17 et seq.
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit