Court of Justice 19 September 2002, C-101/01 (Criminal proceedings against Bodil Lindqvist.)
Also known as
Advocate General Tizzano opines that the processing of personal data via a private Internet home page, conducted without economic gain as an ancillary voluntary activity for a parish community, falls outside the scope of Directive 95/46/EC pursuant to the first indent of Article 3(2). The Opinion argues that such non-economic activities lack a sufficient nexus to the establishment and functioning of the internal market to warrant Community-level regulation under the Directive's legal basis. Consequently, the Advocate General suggests that the Court need not address questions regarding sensitive data, third-country transfers, or freedom of expression if the activity is deemed to fall outside the scope of Community law.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 4 · 19-09-2002
Opinion of the Advocate-General Opinion of the Advocate-General 1. By order of 23 February 2001, the Hovrätten di Götaland (Göta Court of Appeal, Sweden) referred seven questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (4 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit