Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 21 February 2006, C-419/02 (BUPA Hospitals Ltd and Goldsborough Developments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise.)
Also known as
The core legal dispute in Case C-419/02 BUPA Hospitals Ltd and Goldsborough Developments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise revolves around the interpretation of Article 10(2) of the Sixth Directive 77/388 regarding the chargeability of VAT on prepayments for future supplies. The Court ruled that prepayments made for goods listed in general terms, from which the buyer can select articles and unilaterally withdraw, do not trigger VAT chargeability as the necessary conditions for identifying the goods or services are not met at the time of payment. Consequently, such prepayments fall outside the scope of the provision, affirming the need for precise identification of goods or services for VAT to become chargeable.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 479 · 21-02-2006
Parties Grounds Operative part Parties In Case C-419/02, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC for a preliminary ruling, brought by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, by decision of 8 November 2002, received at the Court on 20 November 2002, in the proceedings BUPA Hospitals Ltd, Goldsborough Developments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise, THE COURT
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (479 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit