Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 6 July 2006, C-439/04 and C-440/04 (Axel Kittel v Belgian State (C-439/04) and Belgian State v Recolta Recycling SPRL (C-440/04).)
Also known as
The Court of Justice ruled that Article 17 of the Sixth VAT Directive precludes national rules from denying a taxable person the right to deduct input tax solely because a contract of sale is incurably void under domestic law due to a seller's fraud, provided the purchaser did not and could not have known of the connection to such fraud. However, the principle of fiscal neutrality does not protect a taxable person who knew or should have known that their purchase was part of a transaction connected with fraudulent evasion of value added tax. Consequently, national courts must refuse the right to deduct where objective factors establish that the taxable person was a participant in the fraud, regardless of whether they profited from the resale.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 7,035 · 06-07-2006
Parties Grounds Operative part Parties In Joined Cases C-439/04 and C-440/04, REFERENCES for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Cour de cassation (Belgium), made by decision of 7 October 2004, received at the Court on 19 October 2004, in the proceedings Axel Kittel (C-439/04) v État belge, and État belge (C-440/04) v Recolta Recycling SPRL, THE COURT (Third Chamber), composed of A.
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (7,035 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit