Court of Justice (First Chamber) 3 June 2010, C-484/08 (Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc).)

Also known as

The core legal dispute in Case C-484/08 revolves around the interpretation of Articles 4(2) and 8 of Directive 93/13/EEC regarding the unfairness of contractual terms in consumer contracts, specifically whether national legislation can allow judicial review of terms defining the main subject-matter of contracts or the adequacy of price and remuneration. The Court ruled that such national legislation is permissible and can provide consumers with a higher level of protection than that established by the directive, even for terms drafted in plain language. Additionally, it clarified that Articles 2 EC, 3(1)(g) EC, and 4(1) EC do not impose unconditional legal obligations on Member States, allowing for flexibility in national legal frameworks.AI