Court of Justice 28 June 2012, Case C-19/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Markus Geltl v Daimler AG (Directives 2003/6/EC and 2003/124/EC — Inside information — Notion of ‘precise information’ — Intermediate steps in a protracted process — Reference to circumstances or an event which may reasonably be expected to come into existence or occur — Interpretation of the wording ‘may reasonably be expected’ — Public disclosure of information relating to change of a manager of a company)

Also known as

European Union · · · 25-08-2012

25.8.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 258/5 Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Markus Geltl v Daimler AG (Case C-19/11) (1) (Directives 2003/6/EC and 2003/124/EC - Inside information - Notion of ‘precise information’ - Intermediate steps in a protracted process - Reference to

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.