Court of Justice 16 November 2011, C-72/11 (Criminal proceedings against Mohsen Afrasiabi and Others.)
Also known as
Advocate General Bot opines that Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 prohibits the indirect supply of a sintering furnace to a listed entity through a third-party intermediary, regardless of whether the technology is immediately operational. He argues that the prohibition on 'knowingly and intentionally' circumventing restrictive measures under Article 7(4) encompasses both deliberate intent and acts of carelessness or negligence where the offender had reasonable cause to suspect an infringement. The opinion emphasizes a broad, purposive interpretation of 'economic resources' to include any tangible or intangible assets capable of supporting nuclear proliferation activities.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 5 · 16-11-2011
Opinion of the Advocate-General Opinion of the Advocate-General 1. By this reference for a preliminary ruling, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) asks the Court to clarify the scope of the restrictive measures adopted by the European Union with respect to the Islamic Republic of Iran in Article 7(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007. (2) 2.
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (5 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit