Court of Justice 12 December 2013, C‑141/12 and C‑372/12 (YS v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel and Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v M and S.)

Also known as

Advocate General Sharpston opines that legal analysis contained in an internal administrative minute (minute) does not constitute personal data under Article 2(a) of Directive 95/46/EC, as it represents legal reasoning rather than facts relating to an identified individual. Consequently, while data subjects are entitled to access factual personal data within such documents, Member States retain a margin of discretion under Article 12 to determine the form of access, which does not necessarily require providing a full copy of the document. Furthermore, the Opinion clarifies that Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is addressed to EU institutions and cannot be invoked directly against Member State authorities in this context.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 1 · 12-12-2013

1 2 EN Reports of Cases 1 — 2 — ECLI:EU:C:2013:838 1 OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SHARPSTON delivered on 12 December 2013 Original language: English. Joined Cases C-141/12 and C-372/12 YS v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Middelburg (Netherlands)) and Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v M and S (Request for a

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (1 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.