Court of Justice 19 June 2014, C‑441/12 (Almer Beheer BV and Daedalus Holding BV v Van den Dungen Vastgoed BV and Oosterhout II BVBA.)
Also known as
Advocate General Sharpston opines that Directive 2003/71/EC does not apply to court-ordered enforced sales of securities intended to satisfy a debt, as such proceedings fall within the sphere of civil justice rather than the regulated securities market. The Opinion further suggests that such sales are excluded from the Directive's scope if the total consideration, determined by the specific amount to be raised in the court order plus procedural costs, falls below the applicable statutory threshold. Consequently, the obligation to publish a prospectus should not be imposed on a judicial officer (deurwaarder) or creditor in the context of a public auction resulting from a compulsory attachment.AI
European Union · · · 19-06-2014
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SHARPSTON delivered on 19 June 2014 ( 1 ) Case C‑441/12 Almer Beheer BV and Daedalus Holding BV v Van den Dungen Vastgoed BV and Oosterhout II BVBA (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)) ‛Company law — Directive 2003/71/EC — Obligation to publish a prospectus when securities are offered for sale to the public — Scope of
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit