Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 3 April 2014, C‑387/12 (Hi Hotel HCF SARL v Uwe Spoering.)

Also known as

The Court's judgment in Case C-387/12 addresses the interpretation of Article 5(3) of Council Regulation No 44/2001 concerning international jurisdiction in tort cases, specifically regarding copyright infringement across Member States. The Court ruled that jurisdiction cannot be established based on the causal event of damage if the defendant did not act within the court's jurisdiction; instead, it can be established based on where the alleged damage occurs, provided that such damage may occur within that jurisdiction. This decision clarifies that courts can only adjudicate on damage occurring within their territory, reinforcing the principle of territoriality in copyright disputes.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 64 · 03-04-2014

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 3 April 2014 ( *1 ) ‛Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — International jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict — Act committed in one Member State consisting in participation in an act of tort or delict committed in another Member State — Determination of the place where the harmful event occurred’ In

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (64 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.