Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 10 December 2013, C‑394/12 (Shamso Abdullahi v Bundesasylamt.)
Also known as
The core legal dispute in this judgment revolves around the interpretation of Article 19(2) of Regulation No 343/2003, specifically regarding the conditions under which an asylum applicant can challenge a Member State's decision to take charge of their application based on systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure. The Court ruled that such a challenge must demonstrate a real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment as defined by Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The judgment emphasizes the importance of mutual confidence among Member States in the Common European Asylum System and the necessity for rapid processing of asylum applications.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 12,073 · 10-12-2013
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 10 December 2013 ( *1 ) ‛Request for a preliminary ruling — Common European Asylum System — Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 — Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application — Review of compliance with the criteria for determining responsibility for examining the asylum application — Scope of judicial review’ In Case C‑394/12,
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (12,073 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit