Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 7 November 2013, C‑473/12 (Institut professionnel des agents immobiliers (IPI) v Geoffrey Englebert and Others.)

Also known as

The Court's judgment addresses the interpretation of Article 13(1) of Directive 95/46/EC regarding the obligation of Member States to inform data subjects about the processing of their personal data, concluding that Member States have the option, but not the obligation, to implement exceptions to this duty. Additionally, it confirms that the activities of private detectives investigating ethical breaches within regulated professions, such as estate agents, fall under the exception outlined in Article 13(1)(d), provided that the Member State has chosen to implement this exception. The ruling emphasizes the flexibility granted to Member States in determining the necessity of such legislative measures.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 153 · 07-11-2013

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 7 November 2013 ( *1 ) ‛Processing of personal data — Directive 95/46/EC — Articles 10 and 11 — Obligation to inform — Article 13(1)(d) and (g) — Exceptions — Scope of exceptions — Private detectives acting for the supervisory body of a regulated profession — Directive 2002/58/EC — Article 15(1)’ In Case C‑473/12, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (153 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.