Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) 5 December 2013, C‑508/12 (Walter Vapenik v Josef Thurner.)

Also known as

The Court's judgment interprets Article 6(1)(d) of Regulation No 805/2004, establishing that it does not apply to contracts between individuals not engaged in commercial or professional activities. The ruling emphasizes the importance of consumer protection in contracts and the need for consistency with other EU regulations, specifically regarding the definition of 'consumer.' Consequently, the Court concludes that the European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims is not applicable in such non-commercial contexts.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 44 · 05-12-2013

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Ninth Chamber) 5 December 2013 ( *1 ) ‛Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European enforcement order for uncontested claims — Requirements for certification as an enforcement order — Situation in which the judgment was given in the Member State of the creditor in a dispute between two persons not engaged in commercial or professional

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (44 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.