Court of Justice 11 December 2014, C-293/13 P and C-294/13 P (Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. v European Commission and European Commission v Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.)
Also known as
Advocate General Kokott recommends that the Court of Justice set aside the General Court's reduction of a fine for cooperation, arguing that voluntary responses to simple requests for information do not constitute the 'spontaneous' cooperation required under the Leniency Notice. The Opinion further maintains that a parent company may be held jointly and severally liable for a subsidiary's cartel participation where it exercises de facto decisive influence through economic and legal links, such as exclusive distribution agreements and rights of veto. Additionally, the Advocate General concludes that a participant's lack of awareness regarding certain aspects of a single and continuous infringement justifies a reduction in the individual fine but does not invalidate the objective existence of the global cartel.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 8 · 11-12-2014
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL KOKOTT delivered on 11 December 2014 ( 1 ) Joined Cases C‑293/13 P and C‑294/13 P Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. and Others v European Commission and Others ‛Appeals — Competition — Cartels — Concerted practices — European banana market — Economic unit between a parent company and its subsidiary — Voluntary nature of the responses to simple requests for information from
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (8 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit