Court of Justice 28 April 2016, C-28/15 (Koninklijke KPN NV and Others v Autoriteit Consument en Markt (ACM).)
Also known as
The Advocate General's opinion addresses whether a national court can deviate from a European Commission recommendation when reviewing a national regulatory authority's (NRA) decision on price caps for call termination services imposed on operators with significant market power. It interprets relevant provisions of the Framework Directive and Access Directive, emphasizing the need for NRAs to demonstrate that their pricing measures align with the objectives of promoting competition and consumer benefits. The opinion suggests that national courts may assess the proportionality of such measures and require adequate justification from the NRA regarding their effectiveness in achieving regulatory goals.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 5 · 28-04-2016
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL MENGOZZI delivered on 28 April 2016 ( *1 ) Case C‑28/15 Koninklijke KPN NV, KPN BV, T-Mobile Netherlands BV, Vodafone Libertel BV, Tele2 Nederland BV, Ziggo BV, Ziggo Services BV, formerly UPC Nederland BV, Ziggo Zakelijk Services BV, formerly UPC Business BV, v Autoriteit Consument en Markt (ACM)(Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (5 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit