Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) 20 December 2017, C-504/16 and C-613/16 (Deister Holding AG and Juhler Holding A/S v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern.)
Also known as
In joined preliminary ruling proceedings concerning disputes over the refusal by the German tax authorities to grant withholding tax relief on dividends distributed to non-resident parent companies under Paragraph 50d(3) of the Income Tax Act (Einkommensteuergesetz), the Court of Justice considered the compatibility of that national anti-abuse provision with EU law. The decisive legal issue was whether Article 1(2) in conjunction with Article 5(1) of Directive 90/435/EEC (the Parent-Subsidiary Directive) and the freedom of establishment preclude domestic legislation that denies withholding tax exemption to a non-resident parent company if its shareholders would not be entitled to the benefit directly and it meets predetermined conditions regarding economic activity and substance. The Court held that Article 1(2) in conjunction with Article 5(1) of Directive 90/435/EEC precludes such national legislation because it establishes a general, irrebuttable presumption of fraud or abuse without requiring tax authorities to provide prima facie evidence or conducting an individual case-by-case assessment of economic reality.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 198 · 20-12-2017
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 20 December 2017 ( *1 ) (References for a preliminary ruling — Direct taxation — Freedom of establishment — Directive 90/435/EEC — Article 1(2) — Article 5 — Parent company — Holding company — Withholding tax on profits distributed to a non-resident parent holding company — Exemption — Fraud, tax evasion and abuse — Presumption) In Joined Cases C‑504/16 and
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (198 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit