Court of Justice 16 December 2021, C-885/19 P and C-898/19 P (Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe and Ireland v European Commission.)
Also known as
Advocate General Pikame opines that the General Court correctly identified the legal basis of the arm's length principle within Luxembourg national law, which seeks to tax integrated and stand-alone companies equally. The Opinion argues that the Commission may use the arm's length principle as a tool under Article 107(1) TFEU to determine if a tax ruling confers an economic advantage, provided the methodology results in a reliable approximation of a market-based outcome. Furthermore, the Advocate General suggests rejecting the appellant's arguments regarding group-level tax neutralisation, asserting that the existence of an advantage must be determined solely by reference to the normal taxation rules of the Member State granting the aid.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 4 · 16-12-2021
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL PIKAMÄE delivered on 16 December 2021 ( 1 ) Case C‑885/19 P Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Aid granted by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Tax ruling – Arm’s length principle – Advantage – Selectivity – Principle of legal certainty)
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (4 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit