Court of Justice 19 May 2022, C-466/20 (Case C-466/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH, RW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 9 — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 54, 110 and 111 — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Concept of ‘acquiescence’ — Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Sending of a warning letter — Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated — Effects of limitation — Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods))

Also known as

European Union · · · 11-07-2022

11.7.2022 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 266/5 Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH, RW (Case C-466/20) (1) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Trade marks - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 9 - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 54, 110 and 111 -

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.