Court of Justice 2 September 2021, C-151/20 (Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG and Others.)
Also known as
Advocate General Bobek's opinion addresses the legal implications of the principle ne bis in idem in the context of competition law, specifically regarding whether parallel proceedings by different national competition authorities (NCAs) can occur for the same conduct under both EU and national laws. The opinion emphasizes the need to clarify the criteria for determining the identity of the protected legal interest when multiple NCAs are involved, particularly in light of the existing case law and the decentralized application of EU competition law. Furthermore, it raises questions about the relevance of leniency programs and the territorial effects of prior decisions on subsequent actions by NCAs.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 5 · 02-09-2021
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL BOBEK delivered on 2 September 2021 ( 1 ) Case C‑151/20 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG, Südzucker AG, Agrana Zucker GmbH (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court, Austria)) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Conduct investigated by two national competition authorities – Principle ne bis in idem –
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (5 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit