Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 28 February 2023, C-695/20 (Fenix International Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.)
Also known as
The Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) ruled on the validity of Article 9a(1) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011, which establishes a presumption that a taxable person taking part in the supply of electronically supplied services through a telecommunications network, interface, or portal acts in its own name but on behalf of the service provider for VAT purposes. The decisive legal issue was whether the Council exceeded its implementing powers under Article 397 of Directive 2006/112/EC and Article 291(2) TFEU by supplementing or amending Article 28 of the VAT Directive, which creates a legal fiction treating intermediaries acting in their own name as both recipient and supplier of services. The Court held that Article 9a(1) merely clarifies and gives concrete expression to Article 28 of the VAT Directive in the specific context of electronically supplied services, complies with the essential general aims of that directive, and does not supplement or amend its normative content, thereby confirming the provision's validity.AI
European Union · · · 28-02-2023
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 28 February 2023 ( *1 ) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Implementing power of the Council of the European Union – Article 291(2) TFEU – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 28 and 397 – Taxable person, acting in his or her own name but on behalf of another person – Provider of services by electronic means –
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit