Court of Justice 21 September 2023, C-605/21 (Heureka Group a.s. v Google LLC.)

Also known as

Advocate General Kokott opines that Article 102 TFEU and the principle of effectiveness preclude national legislation allowing the limitation period for competition law damages to commence before a continuous infringement has entirely ceased. The Opinion argues that even prior to the transposition of Directive 2014/104/EU, limitation periods could not run until the injured party possessed sufficient knowledge of the infringement and the conduct had ended. Furthermore, the Advocate General suggests that national courts may rely on non-final Commission decisions to establish infringements, provided they assess the necessity of staying proceedings in light of the right to an effective remedy.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 13 · 21-09-2023

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL KOKOTT delivered on 21 September 2023 ( 1 ) ( i ) Case C‑605/21 Heureka Group a.s. v Google LLC (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Městský soud v Praze (Prague City Court, Czech Republic)) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Actions for damages under national law for infringements of competition law provisions – Possibility of relying on a non-final

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (13 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.