Court of Justice 27 February 2025, C-271/23 (Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 27 February 2025.)

Also known as

The Advocate General's opinion addresses the legal dispute between the European Commission and Hungary regarding Hungary's failure to comply with Council Decision (EU) 2021/3 during a vote at the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs concerning the scheduling of cannabis. The opinion raises two key questions: whether a Member State can vote against a Council decision representing the EU's position and whether it can claim the illegality of that decision in defense against an infringement action without prior challenge. Ultimately, the opinion assesses Hungary's obligations under EU law, particularly regarding the principle of sincere cooperation and the exclusive external competence of the Union.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 1 · 27-02-2025

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL MEDINA delivered on 27 February 2025 ( 1 ) Case C‑271/23 European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Council Decision (EU) 2021/3 – Joint position to be taken on behalf of the European Union – Article 218(9) TFEU – Legal basis – Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (1 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.