Court of Justice 4 October 2024, C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23 (Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet.)
Also known as
The Advocate General's opinion addresses the compatibility of Bulgarian national legislation with Article 19 TEU regarding the indefinite tenure of members of the judicial inspectorate responsible for disciplinary proceedings against judges and public prosecutors. It also examines the implications of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) concerning the classification of the judicial authority as a "controller" of personal data and the obligations of national courts in authorizing access to such data. The opinion raises critical questions about the independence of judicial authorities and the protection of personal data in the context of disciplinary actions against judges.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 1 · 04-10-2024
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL PIKAMÄE delivered on 4 October 2024 ( 1 ) Joined Cases C‑313/23, C‑316/23 and C‑332/23 Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet (Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Sofia District Court, Bulgaria)) (References for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Judicial inspectorate competent to propose the initiation of
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (1 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit