Court of Justice 6 February 2025, C-499/23 (European Commission v Hungary.)

Also known as

The Advocate General's opinion addresses the European Commission's action against Hungary for allegedly failing to fulfill its obligations under EU law regarding the export of construction materials. The core legal dispute centers on whether Hungary's Decree No 402/2021, which imposes a registration procedure for exporting raw materials, constitutes a measure equivalent to quantitative restrictions prohibited by Articles 35 and 36 TFEU, and whether it can be justified on grounds of public security. The opinion suggests that the Hungarian Government has not sufficiently demonstrated that the decree aligns with the principles of proportionality and necessity required for such justifications.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 2 · 06-02-2025

Provisional text OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SZPUNAR delivered on 6 February 2025 (1) Case C‑499/23 European Commission v Hungary ( Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Free movement of goods – Common commercial policy – Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations – Export restrictions – Construction products and raw materials for construction –

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (2 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.