Court of Justice 12 June 2025, C-679/23 (Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 12 June 2025.)

Also known as

The Advocate General's opinion addresses the appeal by a family of Syrian Kurds against the General Court's dismissal of their claim for damages against Frontex, asserting that their fundamental rights were violated during a joint return operation. The core legal issue revolves around whether Frontex can be held liable for damages resulting from its alleged unlawful actions or inactions, particularly in light of its supporting role in such operations, which are primarily the responsibility of the host Member State. The opinion suggests that the Court of Justice has the opportunity to clarify the extent of Frontex's obligations and the conditions under which it may incur liability for breaches of fundamental rights.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 1 · 12-06-2025

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL ĆAPETA delivered on 12 June 2025 ( 1 ) Case C‑679/23 P WS, WT, WY, WZ, YA, YB v European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) (Appeal – Area of freedom, security and justice – Policies on border checks, asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Joint return operation – Alleged breach of fundamental rights

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (1 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.