Court of Justice 27 March 2025, C-2/24 P (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Cephalon Inc. v European Commission.)
Also known as
The Advocate General's Opinion addresses the appeal by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Cephalon Inc. against the General Court's dismissal of their challenge to the European Commission's decision, which found their settlement agreement regarding modafinil to be a restriction of competition under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. The Opinion scrutinizes the legal characterization of the settlement agreement as a restriction by object and effect, emphasizing the need for a nuanced assessment of whether such agreements inherently harm competition or if they can be justified by legitimate business considerations. Ultimately, the Advocate General suggests that the criteria for evaluating these agreements should be clarified to ensure a balanced approach to competition law in the pharmaceutical sector.AI
European Union · · · Cited by 1 · 27-03-2025
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL RANTOS delivered on 27 March 2025 (1) Case C‑2/24 P Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Cephalon Inc. v European Commission ( Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Modafinil market – Patent dispute settlement agreement aimed at delaying the entry onto the market of a cheaper version of modafinil – Decision infringing Article 101 TFEU
Read the full text
This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.
Moonlit adds the citation network (1 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit