Court of Justice 6 March 2025, C-4/24 P (BNP Paribas Public Sector SA v Single Resolution Board.)

Also known as

The Opinion of Advocate General Medina addresses the appeal by BNP Paribas Public Sector SA against the General Court's dismissal of its action for the return of collateral linked to irrevocable payment commitments made to the Single Resolution Board (SRB). The core legal dispute revolves around the interpretation of Regulation No 806/2014 and Implementing Regulation 2015/81, particularly whether the SRB's refusal to return the collateral without prior payment of the corresponding contributions constitutes unjust enrichment. The Advocate General suggests that the General Court's interpretation, which prioritizes a contextual understanding of the regulations over a strict textual analysis, may warrant further examination.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 1 · 06-03-2025

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL MEDINA delivered on 6 March 2025 ( 1 ) Case C‑4/24 P BNP Paribas Public Sector SA v Single Resolution Board (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Sums paid as collateral backing irrevocable payment

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (1 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.