Court of Justice 5 March 2026, C-194/24 (Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 5 March 2026.)

Also known as

Advocate General Ćapeta proposes that the Court dismiss the Italian Republic's action for annulment of Regulation (EU) 2023/2842, arguing that the mandatory installation of remote electronic monitoring (REM) systems, including CCTV, on certain fishing vessels does not disproportionately interfere with Articles 7, 8, and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The Opinion asserts that while the measure is capable of interfering with rights to privacy, data protection, and dignified working conditions, it is justified by the legitimate objective of ensuring compliance with the landing obligation under the Common Fisheries Policy. The Advocate General concludes that the EU legislature correctly balanced these fundamental rights against the high importance of sustainable fisheries management, particularly as less restrictive alternatives like human observers were deemed less effective.AI

European Union · · · Cited by 1 · 05-03-2026

Provisional text OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL ĆAPETA delivered on 5 March 2026 (1) Case C‑194/24 Italian Republic v European Parliament, Council of the European Union ( Action for annulment – Common fisheries policy – Control of the landing obligation – Regulation (EU) 2023/2842 – Installation of surveillance cameras on fishing vessels – Infringement of Articles 7, 8 and 31 of the Charter of

Read the full text

This document is published by eur-lex.europa.eu.

Moonlit adds the citation network (1 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.