The UK Supreme Court 26 March 2015, [2015] UKSC 21 (R (Evans) & Anor v Attorney General)
Also known as
The Supreme Court dismissed the Attorney General's appeal, holding that section 53(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 does not permit the executive to override a judicial decision simply by disagreeing with a court's assessment of the public interest. The majority determined that the 'reasonable grounds' required for an executive certificate must involve more than a mere preference for a different conclusion on the same facts, particularly where fundamental constitutional principles of the rule of law and separation of powers are engaged. Additionally, the Court held that the executive override is incompatible with Article 6 of Directive 2003/4/EC regarding environmental information, as judicial decisions in that sphere must be final and binding.AI
United Kingdom · · · Cited by 62 · 26-03-2015
Lord Neuberger: ( with whom Lord Kerr and Lord Reed agree) Introductory This is an appeal brought by HM Attorney General against the decision of the Court of Appeal quashing a certificate which he issued on 16 October 2012 pursuant to section 53(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the FOIA 2000”) and regulation 18(6) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (“EIR 2004”).
Read the full text
This document is published by caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk.
Moonlit adds the citation network (62 references), article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit