Supreme Court of South Carolina November 15, 1803 (State v. Harkness)

Waties, J.

expressed the opinion oí himself, and of Gkihke, J. that the goods received criminally within the intent and meaning *278of the A. A. of 1769, must be such, the stealing whereof would a capbal felony, or they must be taken burglariously, inasmuch as *be act subjects the receiver of such stolen goods, as accessary, to the pains of death, which the legislature never could have intended