New York Court of Chancery September 23, 1806 (Radford's Executors v. Innes's)
Also known as
United States · · · 23-09-1806
By the Court.
The reasons assigned for a continuance are not sufficient to induce the court to depart from the general rule ; and that is, never to continue a motion for the dissolution of an injunction, unless from some very great necessity, because the court is always open to grant, and, of course, to reinstate an injunction, whenever it shall appear proper to do so, and because too the
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit