New York Supreme Court October 15, 1813 (Jackson ex dem. Minkler v. Minkler)

Per Curiam.

The lessor of the plaintiff showed sufficient, in the first instance, to entitle him to recover. The deed fl'oiii the mortgagee was, however, a protection to the defendants, for that part of the premises which it covered; for though no regular foreclosure of the mortgage was proved, yet the assignee of the mortgagee being in possession, way protect his possession by it.