Supreme Court of Pennsylvania January 10, 1831 (Borrekins v. Bevan & Porter)

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rogers, J.

After the testimony, which is particularly set forth, in the bill of exceptions, was closed, the court charged, the Jury, that the plaintiff could not recover, unless an express warranty, or fraud was proved: That a description in a bill of parcels of the article sold, as blue paint, does not amount to a warranty, that it is so ; and that in