Supreme Court of Pennsylvania February 1, 1841 (Fuchs's Case)

Per Curiam.

An appeal not expressly or necessarily given, can*192not be entei’tained; and certainly none is expressly given in this instance, for the first section of the act of the 16th of May, 1836, has regard to removals only by common law process for correction of errors and irregularities, and not to removals by an appeal, which lays open the cause to revision on the merits, and which has