Supreme Court of Vermont March 15, 1843 (Sanborn v. Morrill)

*704The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hebard J.

For the purpose of considering this question, the facts offered to be proved by the plaintiff, and excluded by the court, must be considered .as true. The defendant, then, stood in the same relationship to this property that ¡Isaac M. Sanborn did, so far as the plaintiff’s interest in the property comes in question.