Texas Supreme Court July 1, 1853 (Houston v. Roberts)

Lipscomb, <T.

The objection taken to the judgment of the court below and presented by the assignment of errors is, that the court had no right to require additional security for costs after the first rule had been complied with; and further, if it was competent for the court to have required such additional security, it could only have been done after notice to the party ami a satisfactory