Supreme Court of North Carolina June 5, 1856 (Den on Dem. of Baxter v. Baxter)

Nash, C. J*.

We cannot perceive the relevancy of the evidence offered by the plaintiff as to the payment of the $2000. It had nothing to do with the case. His Honor was correct in telling the jury that notwithstanding the evidence, there was no obstacle to the plaintiff’s recovery oil account of a want of consideration for the deed.