Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court September 15, 1858 (Palmer v. Crosby)

Thomas, J.

1. The receipt should have been admitted as evidence of the delivery of the property. It was also competent as part of the transaction of sale.

2. The execution under which the defendants justified recited the judgment to have been recovered before Rodney Hill as a “ trial justice ” against “ Samuel Deering.” The plaintiff objected to its admission ; but the objection was overruled.