Supreme Court of Vermont January 15, 1860 (Rice & Danenbaum v. Courtis)

Redeield, Ch. J.

The main question involved in this case is the same as that just decided in the case of Hanford v. Paine and trustee. But there is here the further question, whether any change of possession is requisite in order to put property in this State, when assigned for the benefit of creditors by an act done legally out pf the State,, beyond the reach of the process of our courts against