Indiana Supreme Court December 13, 1860 (Woodward v. Mathews)

Hakna, J.

Suit on note by appellants, who averred that long before the same became due it was “ negotiated, assigned, *340gold, and delivered to them for a valuable consideration,” &c. Answer: 1. Want of consideration. 2. That the note was procured by false and fraudulent representations. 3. That the note was given to procure the exclusive right to use , .