California Supreme Court July 1, 1861 (Fore v. Manlove)
Also known as
United States · · · 01-07-1861
Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court
Cope, J. concurring.
*438If a judgment be the subject of levy and sale, as appellant contends, the purchaser would only take as assignee. Ho title to the chose in action different from that passing by act of assignment, made immediately by the owner of it, would be communicated by the Sheriff’s sale.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit