Supreme Court of Alabama January 15, 1862 (Hurter & Hill v. Buford)

STONE, J.

We do not think the circuit court erred in permitting the defendant Savage to testify in favor of his co-defendant, Buford. The plaintiffs had closed their evi*245dence, and, so far as we are informed by the record, there was no testimony against Mr. Savage. The case is directly within the letter of the statute. — Code, § 2288 ; Rabby v. O’Grady, 33 Ala. 255.