California Supreme Court May 6, 1864, No. 225 (Sayer v. McNulty)
Also known as
United States · · · 06-05-1864
SAWYER, J.
We think the bill of sale introduced in evidence by defendants inadmissible. It does not purport to be the act of plaintiff or to have been executed by his authority. There is no allusion whatever to plaintiff in the document.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit