The Superior Court of New York City January 15, 1871 (Bailey v. Belmont)

By the Court.*—Monell, J.

If this action can be sustained by the plaintiff, I can see no reason why he should not have a receiver to protect his interest in it. Of course, such receiver must necessarily be subor*273dinated to any receiver already appointed, or to any other authority under which the money in controversy, or any part of it, is now held.