Court of Appeals of Kentucky October 26, 1872 (Willis v. Rainey's Admr.)
Also known as
United States · · · 26-10-1872
Opinion by
Judge Lindsay:
There should have been a reply to the answer and cross-petition of Samuel Willis. The statement of facts therein set up is not identical with that pleaded by H. C. Willis. Besides, while *715appellee may have been able to state truthfully that he had neither knowledge nor information sufficient to form a belief as to the matters relied on by H. C.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit