Court of Appeals of Kentucky June 15, 1875 (Mitchell v. Woodlington)
Also known as
United States · · · 15-06-1875
Opinion by
Judge Lindsay:
A surety may maintain an action against his principal to compel him to discharge the debt or liability for which the surety is bound, after the same has become due, and in certain contingencies may sue to obtain indemnity before the debt or liability becomes due.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit