Supreme Court of North Carolina June 5, 1876 (Samuel Reid v. Chatham)

RodmaN, J.

1. For the reasons which are clearly and concisely stated in the able argument of the counsel for the plaintiff, and upon the authorities there cited, we are of <opinion that the defendants are estopped to deny the title of the present plaintiffs to an undivided sixth of the land sued for. Claiming under Marley, who held as tenant by

*93

curtesy under the mother of the plaintiffs.