Supreme Court of Iowa April 24, 1876 (Hammond v. C. & N. W. R.)

Adams, J.

1.railroads: of'statute0;11 stock. T. It is contended by the appellant that the mule was not running at large, within the meaning of those words as used in the statute, but it was held in Hinman v. The Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R. Co., 28 Iowa) 494, that the Words running at large import that the stock is not under the control of the owner. The mule in this ease escaped.